Need for media training

I always advocate to clients the need for media training. Even if they are never interviewed by the press, it’s still good to learn how to speak on message in front of other audiences. And most importantly, you don’t want to miss an opportunity to say something positive.

The last point is clear in The New York Times Magazine‘s interview with Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder. The billionaire has been a constant target of criticism by both fans and the media since buying the team in 1999.

Snyder certainly didn’t make things better for himself in the article. He comes off as defensive and uncaring; I can’t imagine he’s ever had any media training. For example:

  • He babbles when asked why as a Republican is he going to install solar panels and plug-in stations at the stadium. A better answer would have been, “We care about enhancing the fan experience at FedEx Field, and this provides us the opportunity to do so.”
  • Snyder becomes irrational when asked about his lawsuit against a newspaper and admits he did not read the (entire) article. First of all, I can’t believe his lawyers agreed to allow him to sue, since those cases usually favor the medium. Still, he could have said, “There were many factual errors in the article, and we have repeatedly asked for a correction. That is all I can say.” 
  • He says “the media overblows most things” when asked about the constant drumbeat of negative stories about him. Dan should have said, “Winning is always the cure. We are putting the team in a position to have success. For example …”

It gets worse in the online extension of the article. See for yourself: http://6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/12/daniel-snyder-owner-of-the-redskins-keeps-on-talking/?ref=magazine

Funny text messages

Besides phone calls and email, there are a few clients with whom I text message. I try not to make the texts too sloppy, as I have to still be professional despite the medium.

One thing I do is double-check all texts before I send them. Here are some funny examples of the autocorrect feature messing up some text messages (warning, NSFW). I would probably die of embarrassment if these happened to me, especially during a communication with a client!

http://damnyouautocorrect.com/10484/the-top-15-most-popular-dyac-texts-of-all-time/

Who cares about Asian carp?

I’m really sick of the recurring stories about Asian carp. Reporters and editors preach so much about publishing stories that matter to/affect their readers, but the Asian carp is not one of them. If it did, reporters would explain why higher in the story.

Take this story from The Capital Times, titled “Fears become reality as invasive Asian carp detected in two Wisconsin Rivers.” Who is fearing the Asian carp? Not the vast majority of readers, I suspect.

In fact, it isn’t until the seventh paragraph that the writer says “… carp destroy and disturb the natural habitat of waterways because of their ability to eat a significant amount of plankton daily.”

At this point, the writer fails to explain how destroyed waterways directly impact the reader. As it stands, the article just sounds like another whiny environmental piece, and most people nowadays are immune to those types of stories, it seems.

Note: I don’t mean to single-out The Capital Times. Other newspapers, such as the Wisconsin State Journal and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, are guilty as well.