Blog

Augmented Reality: Engaging or Intrusive?

Can technology become more realistic and interactive without growing more intrusive?

It seems every aspect of modern life is being integrated with technology, and with it, people are losing privacy and human interaction.

In public relations, this next technological step is augmented reality, which is the use of computer-generated data to reflect real-world images. AR allows consumers to learn more about a place, object or brand simply by holding a smartphone or tablet above it. For example:

So far, augmented reality has mostly been used for mobile apps but has had success in a variety of campaigns this year. The World Wildlife Foundation and Coca-Cola allowed European museum visitors to see the effects of the melting ice caps and President Obama virtually high-fived voters during his campaign.

AR changes the constraints regarding where and how customers can consume messages and interact with brands. It allows for deeper, more realistic relationships between brands, campaigns, products and consumers.

The goal of public relations is to build a relationship between brands and consumers. In my opinion, the ability to bring brands to life and create interactions with consumers is thus a great opportunity.

Augmented reality changes public relations only by make interactions more life-like. I don’t think there is any or much fear of intrusion with augmented reality because it is projecting a message and creating a consumer experience that gives the consumers control of where to access this augmented reality and when to end the engagement.

The importance of accreditation in PR

The Public Relations Society of America announced this week that it’s planning to enhance the profile and prestige of the Accredited in Public Relations (APR) Credential.

In an article titled, “Should PR pros get accredited?” on PR Daily, I talk about how accreditation helps separate the contenders from the pretenders. That’s because public relations is an experience-based profession, meaning that you learn more on how to do it outside the classroom than inside. As a result, it has a low barrier to entry, and anyone can claim they “do PR” without an education of the basics.

Let’s take a look at media relations (e.g. pitching), what a lot of people associate PR with. Many so-called PR practitioners will promise only media coverage for their clients. But all accredited professionals know that media coverage alone is not a goal or objective, it’s simply an output.

Thus, it’s unfortunate that a few bad apples can spoil perceptions about the profession, an example being Facebook hiring a PR firm to plant negative news about Google. I’m hopeful that as more professionals earn their accreditation, the perception of PR–both internal and external–will be much improved.

The importance of networking offline

I network a lot. I’ve even given three presentations on how to network. I always recommend that meeting people in-person will bring you more success than meeting online. Of course, I supplement my networking through social media tools like LinkedIn and Twitter, but nothing beats face-to-face interaction.

That’s because it’s easier to develop the rapport or relationship you need to do business with someone, provide a referral or offer job leads. I can’t imagine doing any of these things without having met someone, just like you wouldn’t marry someone without first going on some live dates.

Put another way, every consultant or business offers essentially the same level of service (don’t kid yourself). When you’re at a networking event, you’re not selling your services; you’re selling “you.” That’s how people decide on which accountant, lawyer, financial planner and yes, PR consultant, to hire.