Bad leaders = bad organizations

Good leaders are invaluable to an organization. Bad leaders are poisonous. That’s obvious, isn’t it?

According to a Forbes article, “The result of bad leadership is low morale, high turnover and a decreased ability to have any sustainable success.”

I see bad leadership all the time in all industries, including sports. Last month, with the University of Wisconsin football team leading 52-0 and playing its third-stringers, Maryland acted as bad sports by keeping its starters in and scoring with less than a minute remaining instead of also resting its starters.

A week later, Maryland’s team captains didn’t shake hands with Penn State’s captains, a major sign of disrespect. That’s in addition to the confrontation Maryland’s players initiated with Penn State players prior to the game.

Maryland Head Coach Randy Edsall is at the center of all of this. His players’ actions are a direct reflection of the kind of poor leader he is. The Big Ten Conference publicly reprimanded him last week and fined the university $10,000.

Even if the Terrapins won the national championship, I would still be hard-pressed to feel any respect toward the program. But with a bad leader like Edsall at the helm, I highly doubt they would ever come close.

Speed vs. Accuracy

I am always bothered by the media’s desire to be the first to report something, especially before facts are checked.

(Case in point: CNN reporting a Coast Guard training exercise on the Potomac River as a “suspicious vessel in DC.”)

That’s why I was happy to hear Good Morning America’s Amy Robach mention in a Q&A session after her keynote speech at the 2014 PRSA International Conference that ABC News is happy to be the last network to report a news story to ensure accuracy.

However, without any true consequences for their mistakes, most media will unfortunately be content with issuing apologies in exchange for getting it correct (and first) every now and then.

Competitor to Facebook?

Is there a new social network sheriff in town? At one point, creators of the ad-free social network Ello thought it could be the next big thing. However since it launched a few weeeks ago, user numbers have seemed to collapse.

Ello launched in August by invitation-only to roughly 90 users. Creators thought in a few short months its user numbers could reach more than one million with up to 100,000 invite requests a day. However, this lofty goal was never achieved.

As mentioned before, Ello doesn’t use advertising, which has raised some eyebrows as to how it will generate money. According to a release, co-founder Paul Budnitz suggested users could “buy” extra features.

The network was aimed at a group of early Facebook users who left when the network required ‘real name’ logins.

So my Facebook friends, don’t worry about another social network competitor. As they say, another one bites the dust.