Pivoting your brand

Kia recently introduced its 2015 Kia K900 luxury sedan, while Cadillac is trying to appease young people with its new logo. Both brands are facing uphill battles as they begin the early stages of re-branding themselves in the auto industry.

For example, Kia is known for selling economy cars ranging from $14,000-$25,000. Kia has now brought a $65,000 luxury sedan, the Kia K900, to the market. Here’s the Super Bowl commercial:

One of the biggest challenges Kia faces is getting traditional luxury shoppers to consider its brand in competition to the luxurious cars of BMW, Mercedes and Audi.

It’s not enough for a company to say it’s now in a different market segment. The company also must change consumer perceptions and experiences with the brand.

One way Kia may be able to do this is by promoting test drives and having consumers rate their experience either through their own channels (e.g. Facebook) or through Kia’s channels (e.g. collateral, commercials, etc.). The third-party endorsements could go a long way.

Meanwhile, Cadillac is taking a different approach in its campaign to re-brand its image. Rather than coming out with a new model to re-brand itself, Cadillac decided to come out with a new sleek logo (top right) to appeal to younger demographics.

The challenge that Cadillac faces is trying to no longer be recognized as a manufacturer of cars for older people; rather, to be thought of as a sleek car for younger crowds.

I think the logo is more appealing to a younger demographic and is a step forward, but Cadillac must do more in its re-branding efforts. For example, it’s going to have to appeal to early, influential adopters within YP crowds. It also may need to position itself as having cars with cutting-edge technology. Finally, it’s going to have to deal with its price points, which may be too high for younger drivers.

Online portfolios: the future of the job search

Just like any college senior, a big part of my life has consisted of job hunting. During a recent search I made an interesting observation. On one of the applications, the only requirement was a link to a personal website/portfolio.

Now, while I have grown accustomed to providing links to Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn (and even heard of making an online profile), I have never seen it as the only method of applying. This led me to one simple question: are online profiles the future of the job search?

Building an online profile provides several benefits over the traditional resume and allows applicants to stand out in a competitive job market. Applicants are not only able to list their work, but they also can show it visually. It also provides simplicity for those who are doing the hiring, by eliminating the process of photocopying stacks of papers to share the resumes of potential candidates, for example.

Users are able to bring together representative pieces such as pictures, videos and published works all in one place, along with the added advantage of showing basic web design knowledge. Building a website has become easier than ever, with tools like Wix, OPResume and even WordPress doing most of the work for you through customizable templates.

Portfolios can include links to other pages, such as LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter. This allows all of the information on a traditional resume, plus the simplicity of clicking to view other resources.

One snag in using a program such as Wix is that since the user is not paying for hosting, the domain name remains in the program’s name (e.g. name.wix.com). Fortunately, this is more detrimental for a business website than for a personal portfolio.

Another concern is how to customize the portfolio for each job that the applicant applies for. One way to address this issue is by writing a specific cover letter to the employer, while keeping the portfolio specific to the field of work the applicant is interested in.

This new method of showcasing work and skills provides the applicants more flexibility in what they choose to show off, and it represents a shift in the world of job hunting.

Why We Love The Olympics

It’s my favorite time of year. Or, should I say, four years.

The summer Olympics are right around the corner, and I already can’t seem to pull myself away from the TV.  Every night for the last few weeks I have faithfully sat down to watch the Olympic trials, and I’m pleased to say I’m not disappointed.  Every athlete I’ve seen looks fantastic, and I can’t wait to see how Team USA looks in London.

I’m one of those crazies that watches as much Olympic coverage as I can get my hands on. Women’s gymnastics? It’s a personal favorite, so you can bet I scheduled my night around watching it. Men’s swimming? Obviously. Badminton, trampolining or the modern pentathlon? I mean, sure, might as well.

But as much as I love watching the amazing athletic skills that the Olympics offer, what I love even more is the atmosphere, the feeling surrounding the Olympic Games. It’s a feeling of hope, optimism, and pride that cynics and realists like myself rarely experience in life.

At risk of sounding cliché, these athletes represent the pride, hopes, and success of our country.  In watching them, you forge this connection with them and with everyone who is cheering them on. You cease to become an individual watching the coverage and instead become a part of something bigger.

I’ll never forget during the Beijing Olympics in 2008 when the U.S. Men’s 4×100 Freestyle Relay team beat out the French for the Gold. I remember being gathered around the TV, cheering for Team USA, who was expected to get Silver, and then being absolutely elated when we witnessed one of the most amazing comebacks and wins in recent memory.

It’s moments like that which are why we love the Olympics, and why, come July 27th, I guarantee you will find me glued to my TV.